Comments:

Melody - 2003-04-30 01:09:32
Thanks, needed that smile tonight ;)
-------------------------------
Nikki - 2003-04-30 09:01:50
Ah, the giggles return.
-------------------------------
Christine - 2003-04-30 18:34:31
Heh, heheheh I live vicariously through you, that is great, I am still giggling. I am only leaving this comment because Rok told me to, so you could give me crap or something... I am looking forward to it!
-------------------------------
katie d - 2003-05-01 05:38:08
So glad he's still clueless...one thing, though. On the subject of boosters. I recently learned thru that woman in Oregon who lost her son that in actuality - and the federal gov knows this, they just don't enforce it - a child needs a booster until the age of 8 or 80 pounds. Not the 4 and 40 or whatever that the current laws are for. Look up Autumn Skeen on the net. She lost her son Anton in an accident in Oregon when her SUV rolled and Anton was throw from the vehicle even though he was tall for his age (I think he was 6) and was wearing his seatbelt. Coz, you know, the kid is cute. kd
-------------------------------
Nikki - 2003-05-01 12:51:22
Hope he's feeling better. Got those old germs licked yet?
-------------------------------
thea - 2003-05-17 10:31:50
Yikes, Katie. Is that right? I thought the cut-off weight was 60 lbs. My son is twice the age of Sauceboy, and just under 80 lbs. (yeah, he might be the type that gets sand kicked in his face one day), but I can't imagine convincing him to sit in a booster seat. His head would be skimming the ceiling, if that's what you call the underside of a car's roof. And I don't think my daughter, at 60 lbs., would agree to it, either. But on to the gist of the entry--early indoctrination on the frustrations of "putting it in" is probably better than our (speaking for myself, of course, as an "old folk") never once trying it on until high school.
-------------------------------

add your comment:

your name:
your email:
your url:

back to the entry - Diaryland